Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Today

Purge
Shortcut WP:AFD/T

25 March 2025

Read how to nominate an article for deletion.

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< March 24	March 26 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Donald Walker (musician)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a writer and musician, not properly referenced as passing inclusion criteria for writers or musicians. As always, neither writers nor musicians are automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because their work exists, and have to be shown to pass WP:GNG on third-party coverage and analysis about their work -- but four of the nine footnotes here are just his own work being cited as metaverification of its own existence, two are blogs, one is a mere directory entry, and the only two nominally reliable sources in the bunch (one book and one improperly cited newspaper article) both just briefly namecheck Donald Walker without being about him in any non-trivial sense, which is not the kind of coverage we need to see.
Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to pass GNG on much, much better referencing than this. Bearcat (talk) 12:19, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Bands and musicians, and United States of America. Bearcat (talk) 12:19, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Männin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promo for non notable short film. Lacks independent coverage, no sign of any reviews. Being screened and winning minor awards does not satisfy NFILM. Wanky promotional writing. One of multiple promo pieces largely created by the films production company. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:42, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Die Tapferen Haende im Chaos der Zeit

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promo for non notable short film. Lacks independent coverage, no sign of any reviews. Being screened and winning minor awards does not satisfy NFILM. Wanky promotional writing. One of multiple promo pieces largely created by the films production company. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:43, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Altacit global

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Spammy recreation of Altacit Global, which was nuked under G5 earlier; see also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Expertwikiguy (permalink to latest report). As for the company itself, much of its coverage is in the form of PR pieces, paid-for puff pieces like this, or some passing mentions with no further detail. Subject fails WP:NCORP and by a good margin. Java Hurricane 11:25, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. Java Hurricane 11:25, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yogodyan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Zero reliable in-depth sources in current article (2 of the 3 sources are deadlinks). Search turned up the same, zero in-depth from independent, reliable sources. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:51, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Hinduism and West Bengal. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:54, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hong Kong Tang King Po College

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no Substance in the article , the given source doesn't justify notability. Rahmatula786 (talk) 10:09, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Hong Kong. Rahmatula786 (talk) 10:09, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wahid Enitan Oshodi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable person according to wikipedia standarts 多少战场龙 (talk) 10:04, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. 多少战场龙 (talk) 10:04, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law, Engineering, Sports, Tennis, and Nigeria. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:44, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yousef Abo Zarad

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for biographies. The article lacks significant independent coverage from reliable sources that establish notability beyond his personal or professional activities Xrimonciam (talk) 09:34, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Xrimonciam (talk) 09:34, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Medicine, Internet, Syria, and Germany. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:45, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kate Corrigan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor fictional character; article sourced entirely to primary sources, a quick search didn't reveal any substantial secondary sources. Not notable. Josh Milburn (talk) 09:12, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Comics and animation. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:45, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Richard St George Mansergh-St George

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural nomination per Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 17#Richard St George Mansergh-St George. Article was restored after being subject to a BLAR in 2019. CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:03, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Military, Ireland, United Kingdom, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:46, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment:: I found the copyright page [here] that has apparently been transcribed word of word. However, from what I see online it appears the subject is sufficiently notable to warrant an article and there are quite a few other independent sources that could be used to rewrite this, perhaps using some of this source to create perfectly acceptable article. Perhaps draftify or start a sandbox that can be worked on by some interested editors. ww2censor (talk) 11:56, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shola Akinlade

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

should be removed due to the lack of independent, reliable sources to support the claims made in the article. Akinlade's notability may be better covered within broader fintech topics instead of maintaining a dedicated article. Xrimonciam (talk) 08:33, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Xrimonciam (talk) 08:33, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Engineering, Football, Software, and Nigeria. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:15, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:08, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Sporting Lagos F.C. as possible search term, does not look to be independently notable. Giant Snowman 19:11, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose deletion and redirect proposer User:Xrimonciam makes the argument that this individual would be better covered in other topics, however they've also submitted this individual's company Paystack for deletion as well-- it seems a curious motivation to delete both of these when they both can be considered notable. This entrepreneur is certainly notable for the region and deleting would contribute to systematic bias on the site. Not only did Akinade get into Y Combinator, one of the first African startups to do so, their exit to Stripe is one of the biggest success stories for African fintech of recent history. The fact that he's now involved in owning a private football club is significantly notable beyond his business interests. More than fulfills the notability requirements Nayyn (talk) 14:08, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GrabUp - Talk 08:43, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sanjeev Kumar Bijli

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for biographies. The article lacks significant independent coverage from reliable sources that establish notability beyond his corporate role. Most references focus on his position at PVR Cinemas rather than demonstrating substantial independent recognition Hka-34 Jyli (talk) 08:04, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Hka-34 Jyli (talk) 08:04, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Film, Delhi, England, and Australia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:47, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Sources cited in the article like [1], [2], and [3] are bylined, independent, and provide sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG. Bakhtar40 (talk) 11:57, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Galatta Ganapathy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:Notability (films). See that Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force#Generally used sources lists Filmibeat as unreliable. There are no reliable reviews [4], [5], and [6]. DareshMohan (talk) 07:39, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 March 25. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:00, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:47, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Tamil films of 2003: standard [WP:ATD]] for released films with notable cast; not opposed to Keep, as this is 2003 and print sources might exist and show this meets WP:NFIC in some way. Opposed to deletion. -Mushy Yank. 10:52, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Labov marketing communications and training

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability (NCORP), mainly unsourced page with promotional content. Cinder painter (talk) 08:00, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising, Companies, and Indiana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:49, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Gokey

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for biographies. The article lacks significant independent coverage from reliable sources that establish notability beyond his corporate role. Most references focus on his position at Broadridge Financial Solutions rather than demonstrating substantial independent recognition. Hka-34 Jyli (talk) 07:59, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Hka-34 Jyli (talk) 07:59, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Finance, Technology, England, United States of America, and New Jersey. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:52, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan McInerney

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for biographies. The article lacks significant independent coverage from reliable sources to establish notability beyond routine coverage of his professional role. Most sources primarily focus on Visa Inc., rather than McInerney as a notable individual. Hka-34 Jyli (talk) 07:57, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Hka-34 Jyli (talk) 07:57, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Finance, United States of America, and Indiana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:52, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Péter Haraszti

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks notable, verifiable sources proving his subject meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines. A lot of media references are personally relevant. Hka-34 Jyli (talk) 07:52, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bibliographies-related deletion discussions. Hka-34 Jyli (talk) 07:52, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Hungary. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:53, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gridbeyond

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite the attempt to make it seem otherwise, there is no useful coverage of the article subject I could find, and citing 4 copies of every press release (or churnalism of the same) about a funding round or a new contract signed does not make for an encyclopedic article. Alpha3031 (t • c) 07:42, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Environment, Technology, and Ireland. Alpha3031 (t • c) 07:42, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CJ Darcl Logistics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

lacks sufficient coverage from independent, reliable sources, failing to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. If the article primarily relies on self-published sources or promotional content, it would violate Wikipedia’s neutrality and verifiability standards. Welcome to Pandora (talk) 14:32, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Welcome to Pandora (talk) 14:32, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Haryana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:10, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Pandora! I have made changes in the article. Adityasharma0701 (talk) 10:33, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:37, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

British Columbia Excalibur Party

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG. I found no in-depth coverage in reliable sources after searching through Google and provincial archives (Vancouver City archives + UBC Library). The now defunct party achieved insignificant results in the one election it contested (less than one-tenth of a percent in 2013), so there is no obvious claim of notability.

Of the 6 sources cited, 2 are primary sources, 2 are blogs, 1 is routine local coverage for the election cycle, and 1 is a routine registration list from Elections BC. I found one more article from a minor news publisher that accepts articles from the general public. A lack of reliable and in-depth coverage indicates a lack of lasting significance as well. Yue🌙 05:24, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and Canada. Yue🌙 05:24, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pitch Yarn of Matter

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been around for nearly 20 years yet has not indicated how the subject is notable per WP:NMUSIC or WP:GNG. Google search for "Pitch Yarn of Matter" comes up with a lot of directories, social media, and sites that have copied from Wikipedia, but not significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. ... discospinster _talk 03:24, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Brazil. ... discospinster _talk 03:24, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Trina Firmalo-Fabic

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mayor of a small town in an island province. Fails WP:NPOL. Sourcing only covers her COVID-19 pandemic feat and a profile from the Obama Foundation. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 03:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Philippines. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 03:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Beings just a mayor doesn’t cut the edge for NPOL#1 and the sources I see doesn’t meet NPOL#2. If there are sources that I missed, I’ll appreciate a ping to re-evaluate my !vote. Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 05:47, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of breweries in San Diego County, California

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOT. This is as close it as it can get to a directory/Yellow Page and I question the encyclopedic value. Graywalls (talk) 02:48, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Companies, Lists, and California. Graywalls (talk) 02:48, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to List of breweries in California. DotesConks (talk) 00:21, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, but remove all of the breweries without Wikipedia articles. Keeping this list up-to-date is unrealistic -- the only reason to keep it is to serve as a navigational aid for the several Wikipedia articles on breweries in the county, but that is a good reason to do so. The yellow-pages problem can be fixed by deleting everything without a Wikipedia article -- anything that gets an article can be re-added. Mrfoogles (talk) 02:56, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of breweries in California. Agree with @Mrfoogles that we should not be listing non-notable locations – microbreweries are common and usually unremarkable local businesses like other stores and restaurants and don't need to be listed, but this doesn't warrant a separate county list. The statewide list should also be trimmed to the notable ones though. Reywas92^Talk 03:30, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Going to note merging appears to have been already discussed on the talk page of this list, so there might be some useful info there. Mrfoogles (talk) 04:18, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:21, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to List of breweries in California. Keep only notable entries (with articles) and cleanse the rest. Ajf773 (talk) 09:14, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I concur with Mrfoogles: Keep, but remove all of the breweries without Wikipedia articles. This will remove about half of the listings and leave only the ones that are notable enough to have their own article. There are enough notable breweries in the county to justify an article listing them. -- MelanieN (talk) 09:48 19 March 2025 (UTC)
There is also Beer in San Diego County, California#Notable breweries as a merge target. There are fewer than 20 notable breweries and we certainly don't need a standalone page for just a bulleted list when there's this article and the statewide list. Reywas92^Talk 14:02, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: If not keep, where should this be targeted.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 03:12, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Marv (Sin City)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor comic book character. While there is a reception, it is just a summary of several listicles, in which the character takes at best a 24th place. Other than that, this is just a plot summary and a list of appearances in various media. This fails WP:GNG and at best could be redirected to the List of Sin City characters _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:54, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Comics and animation. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:54, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to List of Sin City characters: the info currently in reception can be merged to the list, condensed to about a sentence, probably, and the rest of the article is just plot summary. Did a quick google and didn't find anything obvious -- it seems unlikely by assumption he needs his own article separate from Sin City. I don't know of a lot of reviews that only talk about one character except for the most famous works. Mrfoogles (talk) 02:44, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. He is not a "minor comic book character"!!!!! I've expanded the reception. Please take less Sin City-related articles to AfD or do thorough BEFORES, Piotrus. Marv clearly meets WP:GNG. Thank you.-Mushy Yank. 19:40, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 03:11, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This article has significantly changed since its AfD nomination. -Mushy Yank. 10:56, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Carlos Felipe de Habsburgo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:MILL WP:NOTGENEALOGY - reads mostly like a genealogical entry, half of the article is about family tree and their place in it, the rest is places they worked and where they got an education. D1551D3N7 (talk) 01:51, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Royalty and nobility and Mexico. D1551D3N7 (talk) 01:51, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:10, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete Did a source review -- none of them currently have a significant description of him. He gets mentioned in the margins as his father, etc. is discussed, mostly, and there are a bunch of non-independent sources about him at conferences. One article talks about his children, interestingly enough, but not really him.

Googling, I immediately find sources mentioning him -- e.g.

Overall they seem to all focus on events he attends & one or two interviews, but not really about him. There's also this book in Spanish whose relevance I'm unsure of.

However, I feel like a more thorough Spanish source search might turn up some things. Mrfoogles (talk) 02:55, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: On ProQuest, the most representative database for Spanish-language media in the Wikipedia Library, he receives a meager 13 hits, all of which are again trivial mentions about events he attended and his relation to the line. Moreover, the only scholarly coverage is a minor inclusion in a 2024 thesis. Although there are many mentions in reliable sources, they do not amount to WP:SIGCOV and thereby fail WP:GNG. XxTechnicianxX (talk) 13:45, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I'm going to acknowledge the fact the article itself is lacking in notability; but it still has value and potential. Leaving aside the fact he's a descendant of Karl I of Austria - he's been involved in press conferences regarding the history of his family, and has been directly mentioned in a government website (gov.mx) for his involvement with the Morelia Music Festival, which underscores his engagement in public and cultural affairs. Therefore, I vote to keep the article with the intent to enhance it further. JayzBox (talk) 00:58, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your intent, but to do so you'd need to find reliable sources that say more than the current ones do, and as of yet no one has been able to do that. I would support moving it to draftspace if you want to work on it but not now, though. Mrfoogles (talk) 07:18, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 03:11, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Juniper Heights, Arizona

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

We missed this one in earlier passes through Arizona "communities"; it's a 1960s-era NN subdivision that once was isolated in the hills south of Prescott, but sprawl has since reached it. Mangoe (talk) 02:41, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:51, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:51, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Unsurprisingly, the history books have nothing; and the toponymy books are talking about a mesa not a housing corporation (which I am presuming is what "HC" stands for in some old mailing addresses). There's nothing to be had on this. Uncle G (talk) 04:10, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

World Federation of Occupational Therapists (WFOT)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page is a copy of Occupational therapy#Global occupational therapy. If you intend to break it out into its own article, then please remove the section from that article. (The text will need more wikilinks, and will also need adjustment to its tone to sound more encyclopedic.) Brian Kendig (talk) 02:30, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Brian Kendig (talk) 02:30, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:31, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- This isn't an argument for deletion, and you shouldn't use AFD as a way to underline a point to other editors. If you think this article is fine you can remove the section yourself; if you think it's not fine you can tag it with {{tone}}. Before nominating an article for AFD you are required to search for reliable sources in good faith. There aren't any right now, but that doesn't mean they don't exist.

For example, what about this work, which appears independent and is a huge source. More sources are this book, this book, and this book. Mrfoogles (talk) 07:10, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Waheed Zafar Qasmi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG. References are YouTube, Wordpress, and other unreliable sources. Those I can find that are reliable are mainly mentions. CNMall41 (talk) 01:24, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Islam, and Pakistan. CNMall41 (talk) 01:25, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Poetry, Radio, and Television. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:32, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 02:23, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Citizens Action Party (British Columbia)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG. My search through Google resources (e.g. Google Books, Google Scholar) and provincial archives (accessed through Vancouver City archives and UBC archives) yielded no in-depth coverage by reliable sources. The party existed in between elections and did not contest any elections before dissolving. There is therefore no obvious claim of notability. Yue🌙 00:32, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and Canada. Yue🌙 00:32, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:GNG. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 15:35, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:39, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: There is absolutely no sourcing whatsoever on this. The article also says "The Citizens Action Party was de-registered by Elections BC in June 2009." — Maile (talk) 01:34, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Emerged Democracy Party of British Columbia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG. My search through Google resources (e.g. Google Books, Google Scholar) and provincial archives (accessed through Vancouver City archives and UBC archives) yielded no in-depth coverage by reliable sources. The party achieved insignificant results (less than one-hundredth of a percent) in the one election it contested, so there is no obvious claim of notability. Yue🌙 00:31, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and Canada. Yue🌙 00:31, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:39, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

British Columbia Youth Coalition

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG. My search through Google resources (e.g. Google Books, Google Scholar) and provincial archives (accessed through Vancouver City archives and UBC archives) yielded no in-depth coverage by reliable sources. The party's electoral results in 2005 were insignificant as well, so there is no obvious claim of notability. Yue🌙 00:27, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and Canada. Yue🌙 00:27, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:38, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The article lacks significant independent coverage from reliable, third-party sources, and the coalition appears to have limited impact or recognition beyond its own self-promotion or its immediate activities. --Xrimonciam (talk) 10:12, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Link BC

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG. My search through Google resources (e.g. Google Books, Google Scholar) and provincial archives (accessed through Vancouver City archives and UBC archives) yielded no in-depth coverage by reliable sources. The party existed in between elections and did not contest any elections before dissolving. There is therefore no obvious claim of notability. Yue🌙 00:29, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and Canada. Yue🌙 00:29, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - For reasons above and the fact that it cites no sources (which would fail being talked about in WP:NOTABILITY). DotesConks (talk) 04:17, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:38, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Petr Píšek

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable nobleman with a biography that hundreds of Czech medieval lower nobles had. The sources used are only trivial mentions. FromCzech (talk) 07:19, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Royalty and nobility and Czech Republic. FromCzech (talk) 07:19, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I wrote this article as I believe the subject is a politically notable figure from an important family. The subject held royal appointments and was the ruler of several notable castles/villages. The sources I've found are brief, yes, but are clear that this subject was notable during a politically and militarily unstable time in the Kingdom of Bohemia. The subject is 600 years old, and I presume there are many sources that are not digitized or I have missed on my search. I also do not want to discount the modern depiction of the subject (even a characterization) in the recent video game referenced in the article. While not proof of notability on its own, I do believe it supports the above assertions. Mbdfar (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 10:16, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

According to the content of the article, he was the equivalent of a local politician, and ruled only the villages of Perštejnec, Vysoká and co-ruled Suchdol. His family was only a wealthy bourgeois family, not a noble family. There is no article for him or his family on cswiki, which would be very unlikely if him or his family was important like you say. You need WP:SIGCOV to demonstrate his notability. With all due respect, it seems that the main motivation for the creation of the page is the appearance of the character in the video game based on him, not the merits of the real character. FromCzech (talk) 11:12, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
He ruled "only" three towns/castles. Respectfully, the cswiki has 7% of the articles that the enwiki does and is not a qualifier of subject notability. I learned about this historical figure through his portrayal in recent media, correct. My motivation for creating this page was improving Wikipedia's coverage of notable subjects found in this time and place. Mbdfar (talk) 11:30, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I should not have written that last sentence. Cswiki is of course not qualifier of subject notability, I wrote this just for comparison. The existence of SIGCOV is decisive. FromCzech (talk) 11:38, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, to share a comment by Bigvadrouille549, where a source was provided "from the historian Emmnuel Leminger on the Italian Court. You can see that Peter of Pisek was mintmaster between 1391-99 [7]". The referenced text seems to be on page 169.

Another trivial mention in the list of burghers who held this clerk position. FromCzech (talk) 13:40, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quite more than a list of names as you insinuate. Perhaps the position is important enough to have such biographical records collated and published 500 years later. Mbdfar (talk) 13:51, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to be a quite prestigious position if I am correct in equating it to Nejvyšší mincmistr [cs], an article which does mention the subject. Mbdfar (talk) 16:36, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:18, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep The article is well sourced, it probably just needs a rewrite

Alexthegod5 (talk) 22:48, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 00:30, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

delete. Article was probably only created due to the Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 reference mentioned at the end. Cottagechez (talk) 01:49, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- this article is fairly thorough and well cited. The purpose of the notability policy is to make sure decent articles can be written -- this one is fairly decent and talks about him. Mrfoogles (talk) 07:13, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just because the sources are brief doesn't mean they're completely trivial -- the current article describes him as reputed to be kind in church donations, built a church, defended a castle -- there is, I think, enough stuff there to prove that an article can be written and has. Mrfoogles (talk) 07:16, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]