Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Today

Purge
Shortcut WP:AFD/T

17 March 2025

Read how to nominate an article for deletion.

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< March 16	March 18 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Basu Gautam

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks Notability. Fails GNG. 4 out of 2 sources are written by subject himself ( can’t be used for notability). One is press release and another one is a blog written by his friend. Rahmatula786 (talk) 15:20, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Nepal. Shellwood (talk) 15:25, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for taking the time to review the article. I would like to respectfully clarify a few points and highlight the efforts already made to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines (WP:GNG).

I have invested significant time and effort researching and compiling information about Basu Gautam, and I understand the importance of maintaining Wikipedia’s standards. While it is true that some of the initial sources include self-authored content and a press release, these were added to provide context rather than to establish notability.

However, I want to emphasize that my work did not stop there. I have actively sought and included additional sources, and I am in the process of further expanding the references with reliable, independent, secondary sources that offer significant coverage. These sources aim to address the notability concerns directly.

I deeply value Wikipedia's commitment to neutrality and verifiability, and I am fully open to constructive suggestions for improvement. If you are aware of specific independent sources or ways to enhance the article's compliance with GNG, I welcome your input.

Please note that I am committed to improving this article and ensuring it aligns with Wikipedia’s content policies. I kindly request time to make these updates, as I believe the subject has contributed in ways that merit encyclopedic recognition.Please revisit page again GlobalEmpathy (talk) 16:06, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Environment. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:03, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

La Paz F.C. (Colombia)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does it really meet the criteria for notability? It's an amateur football club and there are no recent news about it. Brayan Jaimes (talk) 03:07, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Brayan Jaimes (talk) 03:07, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Colombia. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:34, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to FARC sounds best given the 1E coverage in RSes. Allan Nonymous (talk) 03:59, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – There is no point in keeping an article from an amateur club just because of its connection to a drug trafficking group. Svartner (talk) 04:31, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:31, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak? keep This does have a lot of coverage in a variety of sources over a long period of time and likely passes WP:GNG. SportingFlyer T·C 05:12, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:52, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per SportingFlyer, there's probably enough sourcing. Giant Snowman 18:54, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Clealry notable team in Colombia. Article needs improvement, not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 23:03, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Can any of the "keep" supporters identify the sources?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:15, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: per Das osmnezz, this article needs improvement, not deletion. The notable sources include The Guardian and Al Jazeera. There's enough WP:SIGCOV to meet at least WP:BASIC.--DesiMoore (talk) 15:16, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ironically, The Guardian is just a pointer, had people only looked. There's a paragraph that can serve to expand the article in Watson 2022, p. 239 harvnb error: no target: CITEREFWatson2022 (help). There's other information, helpfully itself built from news coverage, in Wells 2022, pp. 148–149 harvnb error: no target: CITEREFWells2022 (help). ISBN 9781509854257 p. 121 is a glancing mention, but is the sort of source that could be used for an introduction. (Unfortunately, the Alberto Lati book that has more is not, as Ediciones Plan B is a self-publishing outfit. For goodness' sakes, Alberto!) In Boniface 2018, p. 57 harvnb error: no target: CITEREFBoniface2018 (help) is found the fact that this was three teams in one club: men's, women's, and under 20s. I didn't look much further, because then I reached Rodríguez López & Estupiñán Osorio 2022 harvnb error: no target: CITEREFRodríguez_LópezEstupiñán_Osorio2022 (help), which is over 40 pages on this subject and must be good for at least another paragraph, not least on the mixed reception to the idea. Uncle G (talk) 15:55, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Watson, Peter J. (2022). "Conclusion: #OneCountryOnAPitch". Football and Nation Building in Colombia (2010–2018): The Only Thing That Unites Us. Liverpool Latin American Studies. Liverpool University Press. pp. 225–240. doi:10.2307/j.ctv2nnv514.12. ISBN 9781802070927. JSTOR j.ctv2nnv514.12.
- Wells, Audrey (2022). "Forgiveness After Civil War: Yogislavia, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Colombia, and South Sudan". The Importance of Forgiveness and the Futility of Revenge: Case Studies in Contemporary International Politics. Contributions to International Relations. Springer Nature. ISBN 9783030875527.
- Boniface, Pascal (2018). L'Empire Foot: Comment le ballon rond a conquis le monde (in French). Armand Colin. ISBN 9782200623135.
- Rodríguez López, Julián David; Estupiñán Osorio, Juan Diego (2022-09-19). La Paz F. C.: Un equipo que sirve como canal para la reconstrucción social en Colombia (comunicadores sociale thesis) (in Spanish). Universidad Santo Tomás. hdl:11634/47238.

Lola Adeyemi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable "physician", "politician", and individual. Fails WP:BIO, WP:NAUTHOR, WP:NPOL or WP:GNG. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:53, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Authors, Politicians, Women, Medicine, and Nigeria. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:53, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Who said she's a politician? Ahola .O (talk) 14:02, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Has some published papers in Gscholar, unsure what her h-factor is though... I can sort of access Scopus [1], seems rather low. Oaktree b (talk) 14:28, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't mentioned or categorized that she's a politician or an author. She passes both WP:BIO and WP:GNG.

Here are some reports about her on Businessday and Thisdaylive: Why I’m Mentoring a New Generation of Women – THISDAYLIVE, Lola Adeyemi, Founder and CEO at Mentoring Her - Businessday NG but i considered them to be interviews. For WP:BIO, she is a Nigerian cancer researcher that has presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and World Health Organization (WHO), has been recognized by Forbes, was awarded by Johns Hopkins University and a Special Advisor to the Minister of Education, Nigeria. I hope this helps. Ahola .O (talk) 14:59, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails WP:GNG due to a lack of independent, reliable sources supporting the subject's notability. A brief internet search reveals that most available sources are interviews or press releases, which are not considered reliable for establishing notability. Additionally, presentations at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the World Health Organization (WHO) do not, on their own, confer notability. Ibjaja055 (talk) 15:44, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Addite Malik

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The actress is notable, but the sources included in it do not pass WP:GNG. The attached sources are mentions in news about COVID, birthdays, wedding anniversaries, and restaurants. AShiv1212 (talk) 13:09, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Television, and Maharashtra. AShiv1212 (talk) 13:09, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:25, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
To assert that the article subject is notable, as you just have, you must have found sources that demonstrate that. Why did you not cite the sources that you had found, instead of nominating the article for deletion? Uncle G (talk) 14:48, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I watch TV, and I know this actress works as a supporting actor in a TV serial, which is why I mentioned her as notable. I looked for sources and found that Hindustan Times, Times of India, and Indian Express have news articles about her husband, her son, and her fashion. Can these gossip sources be considered reliable? AShiv1212 (talk) 16:18, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Here are 11 [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]sources from Times of India, Indian Express, and Hindustan Times. If these sources can be used to create a page according to Wikipedia guidelines, please try to do so. AShiv1212 (talk) 16:30, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bureau for Paranormal Research and Defense

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is just a lengthy plot summary and a neatly organized list of appearances in media. No reception/analysis. Publication history could be merged to List of Hellboy comics, since it is arguably better formatted. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:57, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, and Comics and animation. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:57, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this article is a candidate for deletion, but it does need to be refocus. It shouldn't be about the fictional organisation in the comics, but rather about the 140+ issue comics series, B.P.R.D. Hellboybookeeper (talk) 11:28, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense, but we still need sources to establish that series notability (reviews/analysis of or awards to the series as a whole). _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 14:35, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:57, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Śrī Rāmakṛṣṇan Svāmīji

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBASIC. C F A 11:28, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Hinduism, and India. Shellwood (talk) 13:25, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tamil Nadu-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:43, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Qezeljeh, Ahar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability whatsoever. This article basically just says "this exists" without further clarification. Sources just state the administrative division of the place and the location, not much more JekyllTheFabulous (talk) 06:26, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Iran. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:52, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails GNG. I'm unable to find any credible source. Ʀasteem Talk 08:50, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Looking up the Anglicizations was a nightmare, produced at least one Anglicization that we did not have which in turn had a lot of false positives, and only yielded prose-free gazetteers with map coördinates, several different ones. Looking up the Persian name showed promise at one point, until it turned out to be a place in Iraq. This is a permanent substub, sourced to a dead spreadsheet, about which we can barely write verifiable prose at all. Uncle G (talk) 18:26, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Openstreetmap takes you directly to a small town at the end of a road which shares a Persian name with the Persian link for Qezeljeh. If we can locate that census, this would pass WP:NGEO. SportingFlyer T·C 03:20, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep I can only verify this to Google Maps and Openstreetmap, but there is clearly a populated place at the point on the map using satellite photos. Google seems to think it's Anglicanized to Qezelje when you click on the addresses of one of the gardens in the photo. Still needs more work, though. SportingFlyer T·C 06:12, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 07:52, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 11:03, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Openstreetmap and Google Maps source data from WP, do they not? So setting aside circular referencing we have nothing; fails WP:NPLACE. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 11:16, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Artur Elezarov

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod. The added sources are just database listings and not SIGCOV to meet WP:SPORTSCRIT and WP:NOLY. LibStar (talk) 10:31, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, and Moldova. LibStar (talk) 10:31, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Nothing in Gnews, a regular Gsearch only turns up database listings and an Ask Oracle link. What's used here is simple confirmation of participation in various events, we're a long way from extensive sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 14:33, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Damian Bao

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Casting directors are rarely ever notable. He has one producer credit and one associate producer credit, no significant coverage. Doesn't meet WP:FILMMAKER criteria. Mooonswimmer 10:30, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:42, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Scattered mentions in film credits or articles about films are what i find, I don't see any articles directly about this person. Oaktree b (talk) 12:05, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tarzeena, Queen of Kong Island

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In my WP:BEFORE all I found was either database entries and reviews on blogs (mainly wordpress). The same, seemingly, goes for the sources in the .de version of the article. I therefore don't believe that this meets WP:NFILM or WP:GNG. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 13:22, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 13:22, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 13:24, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: the 2 reviews on the German WP might be considered expert SPS. I will try to improve this. Worst case scenario: a redirect to Fred_Olen_Ray#Television(listed there) is a standard WP:ATD when the director is notable and the film released, with some notable features (Evan Stone, version of Tarzan, infamously "bad" film) -Mushy Yank. 19:58, 2 March 2025 (UTC) [removed bold of second suggestion; I strongly favour a K after having added more sources).-Mushy Yank. 10:41, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:54, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:54, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 14:55, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This fails WP:GNG. There are a lack of citations that would support the existence of this article besides a couple of reviews. desmay (talk) 14:58, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This article has significantly changed since its AfD nomination. -Mushy Yank. 16:48, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Fred_Olen_Ray#Television. I am not seeing full length reviews or other sources to establish notability. Eluchil404 (talk) 01:17, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:51, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

John Moore (piper)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:SUBNOT. There is no indication from the article that this person is notable. Aneirinn (talk) 07:24, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. What would be the benefit to anyone in deleting this information? He was noted in an apparently legitimate book about famous pipers, so is notable. Station1 (talk) 08:03, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- What benefit does it provide in its current state? There is no notion of any notability in the article. This person being mentioned in only one "apparently legitimate book about famous pipers" does not establish grounds for notability. See WP:GNG. Aneirinn (talk) 09:50, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Military, Ireland, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:43, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
We have exactly one source, which is indeed an on-point biography. But there appears to be no supporting sourcing available from anywhere else, at least that I can find; certainly none are being proffered in the article. The notability threshold that it is easy to exceed with truly notable historical figures is multiple sources. That way details can be cross-checked, and gaps can be filled. I am awash with search matches to things that contain lots of people named John, Moore, and Piper in some way. But all attempts to trim the noise in various ways have revealed nothing at all. Uncle G (talk) 11:22, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The indication that he's notable come from the fact he had a biography written about him by a notable academic nearly twenty years after his death; the average musician that passes the GNG isn't going to get that. There's most likely going to be offline sourcing, but given how common the subject's name is... good luck finding it. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 11:53, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. A single 400-word biographical summary (in a directory-style work seemingly covering almost every professional piper of the era) doesn't meet WP:SIGCOV. As with other contributors to this AfD, I can find no other substantial sources. (This piece on galwaysown.ie is a passing mention which seems to be based on either this Wikipedia article and/or the earlier O'Neill source. Book and journal searches only returns other versions of the 1913 O'Neill source). Per WP:NRV, notability is based on the verifiable existence of significant coverage in multiple independent sources - not merely that there might/could be other sources (that exist only in potentia...). If this were a modern professional musician, who was covered in 400 words in a single source, we wouldn't even be talking about it.... Guliolopez (talk) 12:31, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Besides being a "piper of good repute" we have nothing else that talks about this person. We don't even know most of their life, where they were born. Travelled on a boat, went home and died at sea, is about the extent of the article. Zero claim at notability. Oaktree b (talk) 14:36, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wake Forest Graduate School of Arts and Sciences

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of independent notability are provided in the article or readily found ElKevbo (talk) 03:50, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. ElKevbo (talk) 03:53, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts, Science, and North Carolina. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:31, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - to Wake Forest University. No indication of notability independent of the university. 4.37.252.50 (talk) 22:57, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:56, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect - to Wake Forest University. The three references are all published by Wake Forest and are therefore not independent, and independent sources are required to establish notability. Cullen328 (talk) 07:26, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Suleiman Yunusovich Kuchukov

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced article. Subject has no credible claim of notability. Low rank, lowly decorations, undistinguished service in World War I and the Russian Civil War. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 02:56, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and Russia. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 02:56, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG, completely non-notable soldier. Mztourist (talk) 06:38, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Mztourist - he's completely correct, NN soldier. Might I suggest however the text is kept accessible in some way for merging the regimental and school cadet corps data to other articles on the Imperial Russian Army that could be expanded with it? Buckshot06 (talk) 07:31, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- If there is no objection, I would like to merge some of the school and regimental information into Turkestan Military District. Regards to all, Buckshot06 (talk) 07:46, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  No objection but it doesn't seem to be referenced. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 08:07, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  - If you check the ru it's gwar.mil.ru etc via https://ria1914.info/index.php/%D0%9A%D1%83%D1%87%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2_%D0%A1%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B9%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BD_%D0%AE%D0%BD%D1%83%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87 Buckshot06 (talk) 10:32, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or merge? The latter requires attribution.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 04:56, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pan-Iranian colors

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is based on personal imagination and appears to be original research. The concept of "Pan-Iranian colors" does not exist, and no academic sources support this idea. The sources cited in the article discuss only the modern and historical flags of the country of Iran, which have no connection to other groups considered Iranian due to their language. Sikorki (talk) 02:19, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Sikorki (talk) 02:19, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 04:54, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hossein Tohi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Likely to fail WP:NMUSIC. KH-1 (talk) 04:23, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Iran, and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:29, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: While eligible for soft deletion, this is the fifth reincarnation under this title. Let's go for a solid consensus here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 04:53, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless an editor can furnish evidence of significant coverage in reliable sources independent of Tohi. Persian BBC did discuss his music but evaluating whether or not that coverage was significant would require analysis by a Persian/Farsi speaker. I suspect that this was a brief introduction to playing a bit of his music. Since he now lives in Los Angeles, English coverage might be expected, but all I found was one highly promotional non-independent item obviously generated by a press release or public relations activity. Cullen328 (talk) 07:39, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Guardian Tiger IV

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insignificant 1-2 day WP:ROUTINE operations, one of thousands of non-notable military operations. Almost 20 years later, no WP:SIGCOV indicating a failure of WP:LASTING. Only coverage may be simple listings of the operations in directories or from sources published by the U.S. military that are not thus independent, and not qualifying WP:RS to establish WP:GNG.

Also nominating the following related pages for the same reasons:

Longhornsg (talk) 03:27, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Military, Iraq, and United States of America. Longhornsg (talk) 03:27, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Minor US military operations covered only by US military media outlets are by definition not notable. GlobalSecurity.org is just archiving coverage from the US military. Cullen328 (talk) 07:52, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Faisal Marzouk

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod. The one source added, although looks impressive is just a very small 1 line mention in a long list of فيصل مرزوق and definitely not SIGCOV to meet WP:SPORTSCRIT and WP:NOLY. LibStar (talk) 01:52, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, and Kuwait. LibStar (talk) 01:52, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Swimming at the 1984 Summer Olympics – Men's 100 metre butterfly where his 44th place finish in the preliminary heats (nine seconds behind the fastest time in the event) is recorded. A stand-alone article can't be supported, because there is a complete failure to satisfy WP:SPORTBASIC, prong 5, which mandates: "All sports biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources." (Emphasis added.) Cbl62 (talk) 02:43, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: When his name is searched in Arabic it appears to have a lot more hits, also hits in Newspapers.com. PigeonChickenFish (talk) 03:08, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
“سباح كويتي”, the name you put in the article, is transliterated as Sabah Kuwaiti and it means Kuwaiti swimmer. His real Arabic name is فيصل مرزوق, which also does come up with some results on Google. Jordano^5³ 05:51, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

MilkShake

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominated this for speedy deletion but was rejected because one of the former members has a notable page. But beyond that there doesn't appear to be much notability to the girl group. GamerPro64 00:43, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Thailand. GamerPro64 00:43, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 01:50, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of trails in Brevard County, Florida

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to have significant, independent coverage of the grouping per the WP:LISTN guidelines, and wikipedia is also WP:NOTGUIDE Let'srun (talk) 00:19, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Travel and tourism, Transportation, Lists, and Florida. Let'srun (talk) 00:19, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I don't see how WP:NOTGUIDE applies; trails are treated the same way as roadways, and they are government facilities. The state has the Florida Greenways and Trails System (FGTS), while coverage on county-level trails would no question have a lot of primary sources. What is the issue with the sources and coverage of the various sources? – The Grid (talk) 12:51, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]