Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Rfp)
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:ProtectedPages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here



    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


    Reason: Users consistently edit warring over Tsoi's place of death, between the Latvian SSR and the Republic of Latvia. As Latvia's declaration of independence took place on May 4, 1990, Viktor Tsoi died within the Republic, not the Soviet Union. I am requesting page protection to prevent further edit warring over his place of death. PhoenixCaelestis (Talk) (Contribs) 11:48, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    You and the two IP addresses pushing this edit seem to be unwilling to discuss your edit against longstanding consensus in talk, so it's quite interesting that you're requesting page protection the moment someone reverted you. michael60634 / talk / contributions 14:20, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 22:58, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism on the page has been going up and down for a while, but as of late it's gone up. JayCubby 13:28, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent disruptive editing by blocked sockpuppet IPs. Bgsu98 (Talk) 13:35, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked: 2600:1005:B08D:87FC:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 17:51, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I would also add yet another reminder that ECP is unnecessary overkill when the disruption comes from IPs. Daniel Case (talk) 17:53, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Daniel Case, I apologize; I had meant semi-protection and must have clicked on the wrong option from the drop-down menu. Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:30, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    No problem ... Daniel Case (talk) 22:47, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: High level of IP vandalism of incorrect country of origin Keonxaga (talk) 13:55, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Long history of non-constructive edits and vandalism attempts from IP users. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 15:04, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Mellk (talk) 15:27, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite Extended confirmed protection: Disruptive editing of IP address and not login user vandalism. This is a Ministry of Information and Broadcasting of the Government of India acticle. Please, I request to page protection this government article. THANK YOU Panda Arun (talk) 15:46, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: High level of new account removal of reliably sourced content and addition of poorly sourced content. Article is covered under WP:CT/IPA and WP:GS/CASTE. Chariotrider555 (talk) 16:46, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing. Scoutguy138 (talk) 16:53, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism of sections involving the club's foundation, heritage, backing etc for almost 20 years, look at the oldest edits and newest edits for proof. Nzs9 (talk) 17:45, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. (CC) Tbhotch 17:52, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Including COI edits over the past two days. Skywatcher68 (talk) 18:18, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Entranced98 (talk) 19:20, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: The page has been edited by content creators that have prioritised negative reviews, other projects and iting articles with false information such as "the singer wrote a lot of the lyrics". I am the actual songwriter/singer and I wrote all the lyrics. The content creator repeatedly describes another project that proceeded this one as more notable. It's unnecessary and I consider it vandalism. MercuryPidgen (talk) 20:10, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – I am requesting protection for the Atom Eve page due to persistent vandalism and inappropriate edits that involve the sexualization of the character. Over the past "few weeks", the page has been repeatedly targeted with edits that add explicit, unsourced, and/or fan-made content that sexualizes the character, deviating from the neutral and encyclopedic tone expected on Wikipedia. which violate Wikipedia’s content policies, including WP:NPOV and WP:RS. Additionally, the page has experienced recurring vandalism, which disrupts the article’s integrity. The frequency of these edits suggests that unregistered or new users may be contributing to the issue, as seen in the page history. would help limit edits to established users and reduce the ongoing cleanup burden on editors. This would preserve the article’s quality and ensure it remains a reliable resource. Thank you for considering this request. Afro 📢Talk! 20:40, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unexplained reversions, edit-warring, and vandalism by a rotating group of IPs, never using edit summary and ignoring clear explanations and WP/MOS links. Anwegmann (talk) 20:58, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unexplained reversions, edit-warring, and vandalism by a rotating group of IPs, never using edit summary and ignoring clear explanations and WP/MOS links. ManiacOfSport (talk) 22:36, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated block evasion with unencyclopedic material. Trailblazer101 (talk) 23:04, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Ixocactus (talk) 00:46, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


    This is the Siddhaṃ script for Siddhaṃ script. I see rectangles, but it might work for some. It might be create-protected for a reason, though. JayCubby 18:30, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Handled requests

    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.